(from an updated version of the New Action leaflet distributed at the September 2014 Chapter Leaders’ Meeting).
For a printable version click: Fall 2014 Leaflet Front and back
New Action has opposed the Teacher Evaluation System since its inception.
Rating teachers based on the Danielson model look like the “checklist” we used to decry. Tying evaluation to student test scores is inherently arbitrary and unfair.
Yet this is the system in place. What should we do?
The union worked with Fariña to creating additional observation options. The new contract reduced the number of items we are rated on. These are positive changes.
But we need more. State law linking ratings to student test scores should be amended. “Developing” ratings have consequences – including getting passed over for transfers. We need the right to appeal D’s. And we need a process for questioning the principal’s judgment BEFORE the final rating.
